Technology and infrastructure
Move work between systems without a person in the middle
Operloom builds the connective layer between the systems a business already runs, so data moves once, in one direction, with a defined behaviour when it fails.
OPERLOOM / The system in motion
Connect the work. Keep the controls.
Follow a record through connected apps, explicit checks and a recoverable handoff.
A schema and idempotency check protect the incoming event.
Explicit branches and permissions govern each application action.
An owner, retry policy and failure alert make the process recoverable.
01Business problems
The cost is in the handoffs
Manual re-entry is rarely the largest cost. The larger one is the delay, the inconsistency and the loss of traceability at each handoff.
- The same record keyed into two systems
- Spreadsheets acting as the integration layer
- No agreed source of truth per field
- Failures discovered by the customer
- Connections built by someone who has left
02Implementation scope
Connections with a contract
Each integration is specified as a contract: which system owns each field, what triggers a sync, and what happens when the other side is unavailable.
- 01Field ownership and direction of truth
- 02Trigger design and idempotency
- 03Transformation and validation rules
- 04Retry, backoff and dead-letter handling
- 05Monitoring and alert routing
- 06Integration register with owners
OPERLOOM / WORKFLOW
From signal to action, a traceable handoff.
- 01Incoming eventReceive and validate✓
- 02Validate and transformRoute and execute✓
- 03Write and confirmMonitor and recover✓
03Platforms
The right tool for the reliability needed
A low-code platform is often correct. Where volume, latency or auditability demand it, a custom service is the more maintainable choice.
- n8n
- Make
- Zapier
- Power Automate
- Native platform flows
- Webhooks and custom services
04Operations
What happens at three in the morning
Every automation ships with a runbook: what it does, how to tell it has failed, and what to do about it.
- 01Health checks and heartbeat monitoring
- 02Alert thresholds and escalation
- 03Runbook per integration
- 04Replay and reconciliation procedure
- 05Scheduled review of error rates
OPERLOOM / STACK
The tools, connected by a process.
Common questions
Question: Low-code platform or custom build?
Low-code is usually right for moderate volume and a team that will maintain it. Custom becomes the cheaper option when volume, latency, error handling or audit requirements exceed what the platform can express clearly.
Related capability
Where this connects
Next step
Build a systemyour team can actually run
Start with the process as it works today, the platforms already in play and the outcome the organisation needs. We will tell you what we would change and in what order.