Skip to main content
Start projectENFR

Technology and infrastructure

Move work between systems without a person in the middle

Operloom builds the connective layer between the systems a business already runs, so data moves once, in one direction, with a defined behaviour when it fails.

Manual re-entryCopy and paste between toolsNightly exportsIntegrations nobody owns

01Business problems

The cost is in the handoffs

Manual re-entry is rarely the largest cost. The larger one is the delay, the inconsistency and the loss of traceability at each handoff.

  • The same record keyed into two systems
  • Spreadsheets acting as the integration layer
  • No agreed source of truth per field
  • Failures discovered by the customer
  • Connections built by someone who has left

02Implementation scope

Connections with a contract

Each integration is specified as a contract: which system owns each field, what triggers a sync, and what happens when the other side is unavailable.

  1. 01Field ownership and direction of truth
  2. 02Trigger design and idempotency
  3. 03Transformation and validation rules
  4. 04Retry, backoff and dead-letter handling
  5. 05Monitoring and alert routing
  6. 06Integration register with owners

03Platforms

The right tool for the reliability needed

A low-code platform is often correct. Where volume, latency or auditability demand it, a custom service is the more maintainable choice.

  • n8n
  • Make
  • Zapier
  • Power Automate
  • Native platform flows
  • Webhooks and custom services

04Operations

What happens at three in the morning

Every automation ships with a runbook: what it does, how to tell it has failed, and what to do about it.

  1. 01Health checks and heartbeat monitoring
  2. 02Alert thresholds and escalation
  3. 03Runbook per integration
  4. 04Replay and reconciliation procedure
  5. 05Scheduled review of error rates

Common questions

Question: Low-code platform or custom build?
Operloom replies:

Low-code is usually right for moderate volume and a team that will maintain it. Custom becomes the cheaper option when volume, latency, error handling or audit requirements exceed what the platform can express clearly.

Related capability

Where this connects

Next step

Build a systemyour team can actually run

Start with the process as it works today, the platforms already in play and the outcome the organisation needs. We will tell you what we would change and in what order.